The Impact of Power Abuse on Military Mental Health

Introduction:

Abuse of authority in the military refers to the misuse of power by those in command, often manifesting as toxic leadership, bullying, or harassment. Officially, it is defined as an arbitrary or tyrannical exercise of power that harms subordinates through capricious conduct or continuous abusive behavior. In essence, it is a manipulation of power dynamics for personal gain or control at others’ expense. The U.S. Army describes toxic leaders as individuals with self-centered motivations and behaviors that harm subordinates and the unit while showing a blatant lack of concern for others. This goes beyond a strict disciplinarian or “tough love” style – toxic abuse of authority includes patterns of humiliation, intimidation, unfair punishment, shaming and exploitation of subordinates. Such leaders may not always be obvious screamers; often they appear competent or pleasant even as they subtly degrade others. All of these behaviors fall under the broader umbrella of power manipulation, leveraging rank or position to belittle, coerce, or control others. Though military culture emphasizes respect for hierarchy, when that hierarchy is abused, the consequences can be dire for individual service members, their families, and the overall unit climate.

Prevalence and Scope:

While hard data on the prevalence of toxic leadership in the U.S. military is limited, available evidence suggests it is not rare. One Army survey (Center for Army Leadership Annual Survey, 2010) found that about 1 in 5 soldiers (20%) reported their direct leader was “toxic”. Similarly, a Pentagon forum noted widespread anecdotal reports of such behavior. Importantly, abuse of authority does not only affect those directly targeted – it can poison the atmosphere for everyone in the unit. Witnesses and bystanders often experience stress and fear akin to victims; research indicates that even personnel who merely observe abusive behavior can be affected to a similar degree as the direct targets. Thus, the entire team’s mental well-being and cohesion can suffer under a toxic leader. In the military’s close-knit environment, these effects ripple outward, ultimately undermining morale and readiness. Former Secretary of Defense James Mattis underscored this, warning that no one should “abuse our position or look the other way when something is wrong,” as toxic behaviors violate the core ethical standards of leadership . In sum, abuse of authority is a pervasive problem with consequences that extend beyond individual incidents, warranting serious attention.

Psychological Effects on Service Members:

The abuse of authority in a military setting exacts a heavy toll on the mental health and behavior of service members. Prolonged exposure to bullying, humiliation, or unfair punishment by superiors acts as a chronic stressor that can lead to clinically significant psychological distress. Studies in civilian workplaces have long linked such toxic behaviors with increased rates of depression, anxiety, and even trauma disorders. Within the military, emerging research and anecdotal evidence mirror these findings. For example, soldiers who perceive their leadership as toxic or ineffective experience dramatically higher rates of psychological problems: one study by the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research found units with poor leadership had about 22.6% of troops meeting criteria for a mental health problem, compared to only 5.8% under effective leaders – a nearly fourfold increase in risk . In other words, a toxic leader is strongly correlated with skyrocketing rates of PTSD symptoms, severe anxiety, depression, or other psychiatric issues among subordinates.

One mechanism for this is the creation of an environment of constant fear and uncertainty. Service members under an abusive commander often feel helpless, hyper-vigilant, and dread going to work. Qualitative accounts describe affected individuals feeling “helpless, angry, frustrated, [and] depressed” as a result of their toxic leaders . Over time, this can evolve into symptoms akin to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or severe adjustment disorders – even if the “trauma” stems not from combat, but from relentless psychological abuse. Military mental health experts recognize that “toxic leadership and systemic harassment” are non-combat stressors capable of inducing feelings of helplessness and hopelessness, fueling depression, anxiety, and uncontrollable anger . In fact, some veterans report that betrayal or abuse by leaders during service caused lasting trauma on par with or worse than battlefield stress. The concept of moral injury is relevant here: when a trusted leader violates ethical expectations (through bullying or abuse of power), it can shatter a subordinate’s core beliefs and trust, leaving deep emotional scars. Psychiatrist Jonathan Shay famously observed that “bad leadership is a cause of combat trauma”, noting that betrayal by leadership can intensify PTSD in soldiers. Similarly, the military now acknowledges toxic leadership as a potential source of invisible wounds: “Trauma in the military is physical, mental, and spiritual and occurs from combat, moral injury, military sexual trauma, and toxic leadership”. In short, abuse of authority can be psychologically traumatic.

The mental health consequences extend beyond diagnosed disorders. Even those who do not develop full PTSD or depression often suffer a decline in overall emotional well-being and functioning. Chronic workplace stress of this nature leads to emotional dysregulation – affected personnel may become irritable, prone to angry outbursts or, conversely, emotionally numb. They commonly report sleep disturbances (insomnia or nightmares), difficulty concentrating, and loss of confidence. Rates of suicidal ideation may also increase in extreme cases. A long-term Swedish study, for instance, found strong links between workplace harassment and subsequent suicide attempts or even completed suicides. While precise military data are scarce, it is telling that abusive supervision and bullying in any workplace correlate with elevated suicide risk and suicidality. Indeed, military healthcare records have noted suicide among the potential outcomes of severe leadership abuse. Furthermore, abuse of authority often engenders a climate of stigma around seeking help. Service members under toxic leaders frequently fear reprisals or being labeled “weak” if they admit to mental health struggles. Research confirms that those who experience destructive leadership are more likely to internalize mental health stigma and thus avoid seeking counseling or treatment, worsening the cycle of suffering. This reluctance to get help means problems like depression or PTSD can fester untreated, impacting not just the individual’s well-being but also their job performance and safety. Some affected troops turn to unhealthy coping mechanisms – for example, increased alcohol or substance use – to self-medicate their stress. The military’s drinking culture can exacerbate this, with service members sometimes using alcohol to blunt the anxiety or sleep problems induced by toxic leadership. Unfortunately, such avoidance strategies often compound the mental health toll.

Neurobiological and Cognitive Impact:

Chronic abuse of authority doesn’t only affect the mind; it can also lead to measurable changes in the brain and body’s stress systems. When an individual endures prolonged intimidation or harassment, their brain remains in a state of high alert (“fight or flight” mode) for extended periods. Over time, this chronic stress can dysregulate the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis – the hormonal system that controls stress reactions. Paradoxically, studies have found that individuals exposed to long-term bullying or trauma may develop a form of HPA dysfunction characterized by low baseline cortisol (sometimes called “hypocortisolism”) . This pattern is also observed in patients with PTSD and other chronic stress conditions, suggesting the body’s stress-response system becomes blunted or exhausted from overactivation. In essence, victims of persistent workplace abuse can exhibit a physiological stress profile similar to those who have survived life-threatening events.

Neuroscientific research supports the idea that toxic stress at work can alter brain structure and function. A 2018 neuroimaging study of employees with work-related adjustment disorders (many of whom had experienced workplace bullying) found significant brain changes compared to healthy controls. Notably, these patients had a smaller hippocampus, a brain region crucial for memory and emotion regulation. The degree of hippocampal shrinkage was specifically linked to the severity of bullying at the workplace. The study also observed reduced gray matter volume in parts of the frontal and temporal lobes (including areas involved in emotion and cognitive control) among the stressed workers. These findings align with other evidence that chronic psychosocial stress inhibits neurogenesis in the hippocampus and can precipitate depression. In plainer terms, being under constant psychological attack can physically “wear down” brain regions that normally help regulate stress and mood.

Functional brain changes are likewise noted: stressed employees show altered connectivity in neural networks that process emotions and fear. This may underlie the hyper-vigilance and exaggerated startle responses seen in those who have endured abuse of authority. Cognitive effects can include impaired concentration, memory issues, and executive function deficits, likely stemming from prefrontal cortex involvement. There is even longitudinal evidence hinting that extreme, prolonged work stress could accelerate brain aging and raise the risk of neurodegenerative conditions in later life. For example, high job stress and bullying were associated with higher incidence of dementia in one long-term study. While more research is needed, these data make clear that the brain does not distinguish between combat trauma and chronic institutional stress – both can leave lasting biological imprints. The result is an “invisible wound” carried by service members subjected to abusive leadership: their brain circuitry and stress hormones adapt in maladaptive ways, which can perpetuate mental health problems and impair daily functioning.

Physical Health Consequences:

The mind and body are deeply interconnected, so it is no surprise that psychological abuse by authority figures also damages physical health. Continuous stress acts as a toxin to the body, contributing to a host of medical issues. Service members under toxic leaders often report stress-related ailments – for example, tension headaches, gastrointestinal problems, elevated blood pressure, or other unexplained chronic pains. In an Army survey, around 15% of personnel facing a toxic leader reported developing new or worsened physical health problems as a result. Over the long term, the cumulative strain can be serious. Research on workplace bullying has shown that individuals exposed to frequent harassment have significantly higher risk of cardiovascular disease. A large study of 79,000 European workers found that being bullied at work was associated with a 59% greater risk of heart disease (and exposure to workplace physical violence with a 25% higher risk) . In the military context, where physical fitness is paramount, such an increase is alarming. The likely mechanisms are tied to stress physiology: chronic stress leads to persistently high levels of adrenaline and other stress hormones that can raise heart rate and blood pressure, damage blood vessels, and promote inflammation. Indeed, medical experts note that ongoing stress from any source – including an oppressive work environment – can trigger systemic inflammation and dysregulate the immune system. This in turn contributes to problems such as cardiac conditions, lowered immunity, and metabolic disturbances.

Other somatic consequences have been documented as well. Targets of workplace bullying report more frequent musculoskeletal complaints (e.g. neck and back pain from constant muscle tension) and higher rates of stress-related illnesses like ulcers and hypertension. Sleep disruption, common under extreme stress, not only impairs cognitive function but also erodes physical health, contributing to fatigue and susceptibility to infections. Some victims develop stress-exacerbated conditions such as migraines or autoimmune flare-ups. In severe cases, the toll of unrelenting stress can even “age” the body’s cells prematurely. The bottom line is that abuse of authority inflicts a whole-body impact: the person’s brain, endocrine (hormonal) system, and organs all bear the burden of living in a state of siege.

Furthermore, these health issues can feed back into behavior. A soldier suffering insomnia and anxiety due to a toxic command climate may start to underperform, become accident-prone, or engage in risk-taking. Deteriorating health can force increased absenteeism – one survey found some service members avoided work or took sick leave to escape a toxic superior. If untreated, these conditions might lead to medical disqualification from service or long-term disability. Thus, beyond the human cost, there is an organizational cost: higher medical bills, lost productivity, and even attrition as troops leave the service early to avoid abusive environments. For instance, over 50% of personnel in one study admitted they actively contemplated quitting the military due to toxic leadership stress . Clearly, the physical and psychological wear-and-tear caused by abusive authority can significantly erode force readiness by damaging the health of those who serve.

Impact on Families:

The effects of toxic leadership do not stop at the barracks or the battlefield – they often infiltrate the home lives of military members, impacting spouses and children. Service members who endure humiliation or threats at work carry that stress with them, and their loved ones frequently feel the fallout. Military families live with the outcomes of the service member’s mental state; as one Army wife put it, “the effects of toxic leadership flow into the marriage and home life”. In cases of severe abuse of authority, spouses have reported a range of negative emotions and domestic strife. A qualitative study of Army wives whose husbands served under toxic commanders revealed that the wives felt “helpless, angry, frustrated, depressed” and constantly worried about their spouse’s well-being. Many of these spouses ended up suffering marital hardship and tension at home as a direct consequence of the toxic work environment. Arguments and emotional withdrawal can become common as the service member grapples with stress or exhibits personality changes (e.g. becoming more irritable or distant). In some instances, spouses considered temporary separation or moving away with the children until the abusive leader was no longer in command, just to protect their family from the stress contagion.

Children, too, may be indirectly affected. A parent struggling with anxiety, depression or anger due to a toxic boss might be less emotionally available or have a shorter temper with their kids. The unpredictability and mood swings that come from high stress can create a tense home atmosphere. Some families have compared the experience to living with someone suffering from PTSD – in fact, a few military spouses stated that they would rather see their partner deploy to a war zone than continue under a toxic leader, because combat deployments, while dangerous, came with predictable support systems, whereas toxic leadership left families isolated and despairing. This striking comparison highlights how destructive abusive authority can be to family stability.

Moreover, family members often lack formal channels to seek help for these issues. Unlike combat stress or injury – where the military provides some support to families – there is no official guidebook for “my spouse’s boss is toxic.” Spouses in the aforementioned study felt they had nowhere to turn: many were afraid to use Army support services or even speak to chaplains, fearing it would get back to the abusive commander and provoke retaliation against their soldier. Thus, families suffer largely in silence. The stress can contribute to secondary effects such as spouses developing their own anxiety or depressive symptoms. It can also strain military family readiness; for example, in units led by toxic officers, spouse volunteers often quit Family Readiness Group (FRG) activities due to disillusionment or direct mistreatment. This erodes the support network available to military families, compounding feelings of isolation. On a positive note, some families display remarkable resilience – the same study noted that despite intense turmoil, all the marriages in the small sample survived the toxic episode. Nevertheless, it is clear that the abuse of authority has a profound ripple effect, sending shockwaves through the personal lives of service members and undermining the well-being of those closest to them.

Conclusion:

The abuse of authority in a U.S. military context – whether in the form of toxic leadership, bullying, or other manipulation of power – has far-reaching effects on brain and behavior. For the individuals directly under such power, it can be psychologically devastating, leading to PTSD-like trauma, depression, anxiety, and even suicidal thoughts. These mental health wounds are often accompanied by physiological stress reactions that can damage the brain’s structure, upset hormonal balance, and deteriorate physical health (from heart conditions to immune dysfunction). The behavioral consequences are equally troubling: diminished performance, increased risk-taking or substance abuse, and broken trust in leadership. Furthermore, no one is truly untouched – fellow unit members feel the strain, and the stress spills into the families of those affected, straining marriages and childhoods. In a profession as demanding as the military, these outcomes are especially concerning because they undermine both readiness and resilience. A force is only as strong as its people, and when those people are demoralized or ill due to toxic command climates, mission success and retention of talent are jeopardized.

Addressing this issue requires a cultural commitment within the military to recognize and root out toxic behaviors before they inflict lasting harm. Leadership development programs are increasingly emphasizing empathy, communication, and mentorship to counteract the outdated notion that harsh abuse equals discipline. By shining a light on the mental and physical toll of abusive authority – with evidence ranging from personal testimonies to neurobiological research – the armed forces can better justify early intervention. It is not merely an issue of compliance or morale; it is a health imperative. Just as the military has learned to treat invisible wounds like PTSD and brain injury with urgency, so too must it tend to the wounds caused by toxic leaders. Preventing abuse of power and promoting healthy command climates will not only save careers (and possibly lives) but also safeguard the neurological and psychological well-being of those who volunteer to serve. In conclusion, the true strength of the military lies not in rank or power, but in trust and respect – qualities that flourish only when leadership is worthy of the name.

References

Black, J. (2015). The effects of toxic leadership on Army families (Doctoral dissertation). ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.

France, D. (2019). From combat to counseling: Comprehensive mental health in the military-affiliated population. Counseling Today Magazine, American Counseling Association. Retrieved from https://ct.counseling.org/2019/11/from-combat-to-counseling/

Giorgi, G., Arcangeli, G., Mucci, N., & Cupelli, V. (2018). Workplace bullying and its relationship with brain imaging: New evidence from neuroimaging studies. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(9), 1899. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15091899

Jowers, K. (2015). Effects of toxic leadership could reach deep into families. Military Times. Retrieved from https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-military/2015/03/30/effects-of-toxic-leadership-could-reach-deep-into-families/

Mattis, J. (2017). Remarks at the Pentagon press conference on ethics and leadership. U.S. Department of Defense.

Shay, J. (2014). Moral injury in military leaders. In The Encyclopedia of Social Work. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.1026

Talley, M., et al. (2020). Leadership counts: Staying ahead of stress. AUSA Magazine. Association of the U.S. Army. Retrieved from https://www.ausa.org/articles/leadership-counts-staying-ahead-stress

Williams, K. (2019). The cost of tolerating toxic behaviors in the DOD workplace. Military Review, U.S. Army. Retrieved from https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Journals/Military-Review/English-Edition-Archives/May-June-2019/Williams-Toxic-Behavior/

World Health Organization. (2019). Workplace violence and stress: A global review. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240004839

Zabawa, D. (2019, May 8). Stress from workplace violence linked to increased heart risks. CardioSmart – American College of Cardiology. Retrieved from https://www.cardiosmart.org/news/stress-from-workplace-violence-linked-to-increased-heart-risks