Histrionic Behaviors in Extreme Environments: A Psychological Perspective
Abstract
Extreme environments such as war zones, disaster areas, space missions, and deep-sea expeditions impose intense stress on individuals, sometimes eliciting unusual psychological responses. This article examines histrionic behaviors – theatrical, exaggerated, or attention-seeking actions – that may emerge under extreme stress or trauma. We review relevant literature on personality disorders (especially Histrionic Personality Disorder), coping mechanisms, and trauma responses to understand why some individuals display dramatic or “histrionic” traits in life-threatening or high-pressure situations. Prior research indicates that while Histrionic Personality Disorder (HPD) is characterized by pervasive attention-seeking and dramatic emotional expression, acute trauma and extreme stress can also provoke similar behaviors even in those without HPD, as an adaptive or maladaptive coping mechanism. Case studies from war and disaster contexts illustrate individuals exhibiting flamboyant emotional outbursts or performative actions under duress. Likewise, isolated and confined settings (e.g. long-duration spaceflights or undersea habitats) may amplify personality traits and interpersonal dynamics, occasionally resulting in attention-seeking or conflictual behaviors. Understanding these histrionic manifestations in context is crucial for mental health professionals and team leaders in extreme environments. This paper discusses the psychological underpinnings of such behaviors, including possible links to trauma-related dissociation, personality predispositions, and the need for social support, and suggests implications for screening, training, and support interventions in extreme missions.
Introduction
Individuals in life-threatening or high-stress situations often experience profound psychological strain. Common stress reactions in extreme environments include anxiety, anger, dissociation, or withdrawal. However, some people respond with histrionic behaviors, displaying exaggerated emotions or attention-seeking actions that appear “dramatic” relative to the situation. The term “histrionic” stems from histrionic personality disorder (HPD), a psychiatric condition marked by unstable emotions and an overwhelming desire to be noticed, leading to dramatic or inappropriate behavior to gain attention. While HPD is a chronic personality disorder typically developing by early adulthood, situational stress can provoke histrionic-like behaviors even in those without the disorder. In war zones, disaster sites, or other extreme contexts, observers have reported individuals engaging in seemingly theatrical outbursts, intense emotional displays, or attempts to become the focus of attention. This paper seeks to explore why such behaviors occur under extreme stress. Do they reflect underlying personality disorders exacerbated by trauma? Are they coping mechanisms for individuals to express distress or solicit help? We approach these questions by reviewing literature on personality, trauma, and extreme environmental psychology. The introduction defines histrionic behavior and situates it in extreme contexts, while later sections delve into case examples and theoretical explanations for these dramatic stress responses.
Histrionic Personality Disorder provides a starting point for understanding dramatic behavior. People with HPD characteristically crave attention and often employ flamboyant emotions or theatrical mannerisms to remain in the spotlight. They may appear charming and lively, but their emotional expressions are frequently shallow or rapidly shifting, and they feel unappreciated when not the center of attention. Importantly, HPD is considered a Cluster B personality disorder (the “dramatic, erratic” cluster), alongside borderline and narcissistic disorders. All these conditions involve difficulties with emotion regulation and interpersonal attention, though HPD is most specifically associated with overt theatricality and exhibitionism. In ordinary circumstances, someone with HPD might constantly seek approval, exaggerate stories, or act out for sympathy. However, what happens when any individual – whether or not they carry an HPD diagnosis – is pushed to psychological extremes by a crisis or an extreme environment? The introduction sets the stage for examining how extreme stress can precipitate histrionic-like behaviors in both clinical and non-clinical populations.
Literature Review
Personality Disorders, Trauma, and Stress Responses
Histrionic Personality Disorder (HPD) is defined by pervasive attention-seeking behavior, excessive emotionality, and a dramatic presentation. Those with HPD often behave inappropriately or “larger-than-life” to ensure they are noticed. Etiological theories of HPD suggest a combination of genetic factors and early environmental influences, such as childhood experiences that reinforce dramatic behavior or inconsistent parental attention. Interestingly, some research indicates that traumatic experiences (e.g. childhood abuse or loss) might contribute to the development of histrionic traits as a maladaptive coping strategy. Indeed, trauma in early life is a well-known risk factor for various personality disorders. However, most classic cases of HPD are thought to emerge from long-term personality development rather than sudden trauma in adulthood.
When considering extreme stress in adulthood, such as combat or disasters, research has more commonly focused on Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and related anxiety or mood disturbances, rather than personality pathology. Nonetheless, recent studies have begun to document how severe adult trauma can lead to enduring personality changes or exacerbate latent personality traits. For example, a cohort study in Croatia examined individuals 15 years after exposure to war trauma and found that a significant subset reported their personality problems began after the traumatic events. These “late-onset” personality changes often manifested in Cluster B and C traits – notably borderline, paranoid, schizoid, and avoidant features were prevalent – indicating that trauma can induce complex personality pathology. Interestingly, that study found histrionic traitswere less common among late-onset cases compared to those with pre-existing personality disorders. In other words, war trauma was more likely to trigger other personality changes (e.g. borderline-type instability or paranoid mistrust) than to trigger a de novo histrionic personality. This aligns with clinical impressions that full HPD is relatively rare (about 1% prevalence) and may require longstanding patterns.
However, even if trauma does not frequently create enduring histrionic personality disorder, extreme situations can still evoke histrionic-type behaviors in the moment. Classical accounts from World War I, for instance, describe soldiers with “war neurosis” or shell shock exhibiting dramatic, bizarre behavior under acute stress. Linden et al. (2012) note that some traumatized WWI servicemen would enter dissociative, dream-like states during which they reenacted combat experiences in a highly theatrical way – “re-staging of battle scenes (e.g. lying on the floor and shooting with an imaginary gun)” during flashback episodes. These episodes were accompanied by aggressive outbursts and a temporary detachment from reality, followed by amnesia for the event. At the time, such behaviors were often labeled “hysteria” or “psychopathic constitution”, reflecting a presumed predisposition in the soldier’s personality. Modern understanding would recognize these as extreme dissociative reactions to trauma – the mind’s attempt to cope by dramatizing or externalizing the terror. Notably, once the episode passed, many of these soldiers returned to a state dominated by other symptoms (e.g. psychogenic paralysis or mutism) rather than persistent theatrical behavior. This suggests that histrionic-like dramatization in these cases was a transient trauma response rather than a fixed trait.
Beyond dissociative “hysterical” episodes, attention-seeking behavior has been documented as a possible post-trauma reaction. Disaster mental health experts list attention-seeking alongside fear, irritability, and risk-taking as behaviors to monitor in survivors during the weeks and months after a crisis. In a field guide for disaster interventions, “increased attention-seeking behavior” is identified as a delayed reaction that some survivors exhibit, potentially as a way to get help or reassurance in the aftermath. This may manifest as individuals dramatically recounting their ordeal to anyone who will listen, exaggerating symptoms, or repeatedly returning to the site of rescue workers – not necessarily out of malice, but from a deep psychological need for support and validation. Psychologist Susan Albers explains that chronic attention-seeking often points to an unmet need: people “try to get their needs met” by “pouring on the melodrama”, which should prompt us to ask why they seek attention. In trauma contexts, the unmet need may be safety or empathy – the survivor’s dramatic behavior is essentially a cry for help, even if it appears excessive to others.
Coping mechanisms for trauma can also be inadvertently theatrical. One example is the phenomenon of “drama” as a way to regain control. Some survivors might unconsciously feel that by amplifying their emotional displays, they can make others understand the magnitude of their suffering. In therapeutic terms, this can be seen as an externalization coping strategy – turning internal chaos into outward drama in hopes that someone will intervene. While little formal research directly addresses “histrionic coping” in disasters, this aligns with anecdotal reports from clinicians. For instance, children and adolescents who experience traumatic conflict at home sometimes develop attention-seeking or “dramatic” behaviors later, possibly as a learned adaptive strategy. In adults, learned behavior patterns may resurface under stress: if a person grew up in an environment where being loud and dramatic was the only way to have their needs met, they might revert to that mode when overwhelmed.
Histrionic Behaviors in War Zones and Disaster Areas
War zones provide stark examples of both pathological and situational dramatic behaviors. Historical records from World War I and II describe not only the aforementioned dissociative re-enactments, but also more deliberate attention-seeking acts. World War I “hysterical” soldiers were sometimes accused (unfairly) of malingering or faking symptoms to escape duty. While many cases were genuine involuntary disorders, a subset likely did exaggerate or dramatize their condition, which could be interpreted as a desperate survival tactic. The line between conscious exaggeration and unconscious hysterical manifestation was often blurred. During the American Civil War and later conflicts, there were reports of soldiers who developed what we might call “noble storyteller syndrome” – embellishing their battle stories with dramatic flair, possibly to gain admiration or to process their trauma through narrative. Modern combat psychology recognizes that anger outbursts, theatrical grief, or gallows humor can all serve as coping mechanisms for combat stress For example, a soldier might perform extreme bravado or act the “class clown” amidst danger, seeking comrades’ attention and laughter as a way to boost morale and mask fear. Such behaviors are performative but serve a psychological function in the war context.
Civilians in conflict zones or disaster sites may also display histrionic behaviors. Humanitarian workers have noted cases where survivors appear to “perform” their suffering when aid arrives – crying loudly, making grand gestures of despair, or dramatically imploring rescuers – in what could be an attempt to ensure they are noticed among many victims. Far from being manipulative, this can be seen as an adaptive instinct: in a resource-scarce emergency, those who stand out might feel they have a better chance of getting help. Psychological research cautions against harsh judgment of such behavior, noting that labeling a traumatized person as “attention-seeking” pejoratively can overlook the genuine distress driving their actions. Instead, these dramatic expressions often indicate acute distress and a plea for comfort or assistance.
One poignant real-world example is from the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 attacks. Photographs from that day show not only shock and numbness, but also scenes of people in highly emotional states. In one famous image, two men assist an injured woman covered in ash, who is wailing and gesturing emphatically as they move her to safety. Observers described many survivors who were “hysterical” – screaming or sobbing uncontrollably – even when not physically injured. Such reactions can be seen as acute histrionic responses to trauma, where the individual’s emotional expression goes beyond typical bounds, possibly helping them release inner panic or attract rescuers’ attention. Disaster psychiatry recognizes “histrionic conversion reactions” as well – instances where overwhelming stress might lead to dramatic physical symptoms (e.g., psychogenic blindness or fainting spells) that inherently draw attention. These were noted in events like mass civilian bombings in WWII and are considered a stress-induced quasi-hysterical phenomenon.
In terms of clinical diagnoses, a question arises: do trauma-exposed populations show higher incidence of personality disorders like HPD? While full research is limited, some studies on refugees and war survivors find elevated rates of certain personality disorder traits, especially borderline and paranoid traits, but not consistently histrionic. Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) in particular, which involves unstable emotions and frantic efforts to avoid abandonment, is often linked to trauma history and can include attention-seeking self-harm or emotional outbursts. BPD and HPD can sometimes overlap in presentation (dramatic emotions, need for attention), though BPD has more self-destructive features. The literature suggests that complex trauma (prolonged, repeated trauma) can lead to “complex PTSD” or even proposed diagnoses like Enduring Personality Change after Catastrophic Experience, which encompasses negative self-concept and interpersonal dysfunction. It is plausible that within those interpersonal changes, some individuals adopt a dramatic interpersonal style as part of their post-trauma personality change – but this remains under-researched. Anecdotally, clinicians working with combat veterans or disaster survivors may encounter patients who seem to dramatize their experiences. Rather than viewing this as simply narcissistic, it often reflects how identity and behavior can be reshaped by trauma, sometimes yielding an exaggerated emotional demeanor as a defense.
Extreme Team Environments: Space Missions and Deep-Sea Exploration
Extreme environments are not limited to combat or disasters; they also include isolated, confined expeditions such as crewed space missions, polar station overwinters, or deep-sea submersible projects. In these settings, individuals are subjected to chronic stressors: isolation, sensory deprivation or monotony, close-quarters living, and high-stakes tasks. Team dynamics in such missions can magnify personality traits. Space psychology research emphasizes selecting astronauts who are stable, resilient, and low in interpersonal drama. Indeed, space agencies deliberately screen out applicants with Cluster B personality disorders (including HPD) because dramatic, erratic behavior could endanger mission cohesion. However, even psychologically healthy crews can experience “behavioral eruptions” under extreme conditions.
Psychologists note that in isolated missions, “everything gets magnified” and even small interpersonal frictions can escalate rapidly. A minor bid for attention, which on Earth might be ignored, could spiral into conflict on a Mars mission due to the intense interpersonal microscope effect. There have been instances in spaceflight history hinting at dramatic behavior: during the 1973 Skylab 4 mission, astronauts famously had a conflict with ground control over workload, culminating in an unscheduled “strike” or mutiny. While largely a labor-management dispute, some accounts describe it as the crew making a dramatic statement to assert their needs (essentially demanding attention to their mental health). The Skylab episode underscores that even highly trained individuals might resort to theatrical tactics (like a one-day radio silence protest) when pushed to psychological breaking points.
In polar or undersea missions, journals and interviews sometimes mention a crew member who becomes the “drama source” – someone who perhaps copes with boredom or stress by stirring up interpersonal drama or by exaggerating complaints. A recent case from an Antarctic research station involved a team member allegedly exhibiting extreme behaviors (outbursts, even threats), creating a “drama [that] unfold[ed]” and jeopardizing team safety. Experts analyzing the incident cautioned that such cases, while rare, reflect how the pressures of confinement can cause psychological unraveling, occasionally in the form of attention-seeking or aggressive theatrics. Spaceflight analog studies (like NASA’s HERA and NEEMO projects) consistently find that certain personality combinations can lead to friction. For example, putting multiple strong extroverts together in a tiny habitat might trigger competition for social attention, resulting in showy behavior or conflict for leadership. The importance of balance is noted: a person with a mild histrionic style – entertaining and emotive – can be beneficial for group morale, but if stress pushes that into excessive drama or egocentrism, it can harm group functioning.
It’s worth noting that in these environments, flamboyant behavior might also be a coping or even a deliberate morale strategy. Some astronauts and explorers use humor, pranks, or “clowning around” to alleviate tension (NASA research refers to the value of the “class clown” in isolated teams). This positive form of attention-seeking can keep spirits high. The line between healthy expressiveness and maladaptive histrionics is context and degree. A “functional attention-seeker” might perform skits or jokes to entertain crewmates – a conscious, controlled use of drama. In contrast, a stress-induced histrionic reaction might involve involuntary meltdowns or conflicts where the person cannot moderate their need for attention or emotional release.
Finally, consider deep-sea divers or submariners: these groups historically face issues like “cabin fever” and behavioral extremes. While much of submarine psychology focuses on depression and aggression, there are anecdotes of sailors who reacted to prolonged depth pressure with what was termed “hysteria,” such as exaggerated panic attacks or feigned illness to get evacuated. One could interpret some of these as desperate bids for relief – effectively attention-seeking under extreme duress. Polar expedition logs from the early 20th century also describe individuals who became “theatrical” in their despair during sunless winter months, at times making grand pronouncements of doom or dramatically “giving up,” only to recover later. These instances, scattered in historical records, align with the idea that extreme environmental stress can amplify or induce histrionic-style expressions even in individuals not otherwise inclined to such behavior.
Discussion
The convergence of evidence suggests that histrionic behaviors in extreme environments arise from a complex interplay of personality, situational stress, and coping needs. In some cases, individuals exhibiting theatrical behavior under duress may indeed have a pre-existing histrionic or borderline personality style that becomes exaggerated when stress strips away their usual self-control. Under extreme stress, even well-adapted people can show regression in ego functioning – meaning their behavior can become more primitive or childlike. For someone prone to dramatic expression, regression could manifest as more extreme dramatics (e.g. louder crying, more impulsive attention bids).
It’s also crucial to differentiate conscious versus unconscious aspects of these behaviors. Attention-seeking can sometimes be deliberate – a strategic move to get help or sympathy. For instance, a disaster survivor might consciously exaggerate symptoms fearing that otherwise they’ll be ignored in the chaos. However, often the behavior is not fully under conscious control. Trauma can hijack the brain’s emotion regulation circuits, leading to genuinely overwhelming surges of affect. The person might feel an uncontrollable need to scream or act out, much like a frightened child, because their capacity for measured response is temporarily impaired. Dissociative episodes like the WWI soldiers’ flashbacks are clearly not under conscious control, yet they appear highly theatrical (complete with imagined battle scenes). Thus, what looks “histrionic” may in fact be an involuntary post-traumatic reaction, a point that urges compassion. As one clinician put it, “we shouldn’t demonize the person doing these things…they’re trying to get their needs met”.
The discussion must also consider cultural factors. What one culture deems “exaggerated” emotional display might be normative in another. Researchers have noted that personality perception varies by culture, and groups with expressive norms may interpret “histrionic” behaviors differently. For example, a Mediterranean or Latin culture might expect vivid emotional expression after a tragedy (wailing, dramatic gestures), whereas a more reserved culture might view the same as excessive. In multinational extreme missions or refugee populations, these differences can cause mislabeling. An aid worker from a stoic background might wrongly assume a very emotive survivor is being histrionic or manipulative, when in fact they are behaving in line with their cultural coping norms. Therefore, context is key: not all dramatic behavior is pathological – it may be a healthy outlet or a culturally sanctioned form of coping.
Biologically, extreme stress triggers the limbic system and hormonal surges (cortisol, adrenaline) that can diminish the prefrontal cortex’s moderating influence. The result is more impulsive and emotional behavior. This neurobiological perspective suggests that histrionic responses under acute stress might simply be a brain-based loss of inhibition combined with a heightened emotional state. The person’s “fight or flight” response can sometimes misfire as a “fight for attention” – essentially, the survival brain concluding that obtaining social support is crucial for survival, and pushing the person to do whatever necessary to get it (raise voice, cry out, etc.). In evolutionary terms, an infant in distress survives by attracting the caregiver’s attention through crying; some trauma responses could be seen as a reversion to that survival strategy.
Another aspect to discuss is the impact of histrionic behaviors on group outcomes. In emergency or mission teams, one member’s dramatic behavior can be contagious or divisive. It might provide a needed emotional release for others (e.g. one person’s breakdown gives permission for everyone to acknowledge fear), or it might escalate panic. Team leaders are advised to be prepared for possible attention-seeking or emotionally extreme behaviors and manage them with calm reassurance rather than scolding. Indeed, harsh criticism of a person acting “dramatic” can backfire, potentially reinforcing their insecurity and prompting even more exaggerated bids for validation. A more effective approach is often validation and redirection: acknowledge the person’s feelings (show them they are seen and heard, which addresses the craving underlying attention-seeking), then guide them towards a constructive role or calming activity. For instance, in a disaster setting, a responder might say, “I can see you’re very scared and that’s completely understandable. We’re here with you. Let’s move over here together where it’s safer.” Such a response meets the need for attention and reduces the need for the person to escalate their behavior.
It is also worth noting that not all extreme environment participants will manifest such behaviors – personality plays a major role. Those with higher neuroticism or extroversion may be more prone to outward displays, whereas introverted, emotionally stable types might withdraw instead. Selection processes for astronauts and explorers favor conscientiousness, agreeableness, and emotional stability. This means intentional missions (space, polar) have relatively low incidence of problematic histrionics. In contrast, unplanned extreme situations (wars, disasters affecting general populations) will naturally include a broader range of personalities, hence we more frequently witness these behaviors there.
Lastly, the discussion touches on the possibility of brief psychoses under extreme stress. Literature shows that in borderline and some histrionic individuals, extreme stress can precipitate transient psychotic symptoms (paranoia, hallucinations). While not “histrionic” per se, such phenomena underline the mind’s potential to break from reality under duress, which can co-occur with dramatic behavior. For example, a person might dramatically insist on an imagined threat due to a stress-induced delusion. This overlap of histrionic and psychotic features in extreme cases was historically labeled “schreckpsychosen” (fear psychoses) by Kleist in 1918 – acute panic-delirium with dramatic, fear-driven behavior followed by amnesia. Understanding these as part of the spectrum of trauma responses helps avoid stigmatizing individuals as simply “over-acting.” Instead, their psyche might be genuinely overwhelmed to the point of losing reality-testing, resulting in behavior that looks theatrical or bizarre but is essentially a cry of an overwhelmed mind.
Conclusion
Extreme environments and crises push human psychology to its limits, occasionally revealing behaviors reminiscent of the theatricality seen in histrionic personality disorder. While chronic Histrionic Personality Disorder is uncommon and rooted in long-term traits, histrionic behaviors – such as exaggerated emotional displays or urgent attention-seeking – can emerge situationally in response to extreme stress or trauma. War zone case studies illustrate that some individuals, in the face of terror, engage in dramatic reenactments or emotionally flamboyant cries for help. Disaster response observations likewise confirm that attention-seeking behaviors can surface as part of the post-trauma repertoire, possibly serving as coping or survival mechanisms. In isolated expeditions like space missions, outright histrionic meltdowns are rarer due to careful crew selection, yet even there stress can amplify interpersonal dynamics, and episodes of “drama” or conflict have occurred when psychological needs went unmet.
Recognizing these behaviors as part of the human response to extreme adversity is important for several reasons. First, it fosters empathy: rather than dismissing a survivor or team member as “just an attention seeker,” understanding the psychological drivers (distress, fear, need for support) encourages a supportive response. As research and expert commentary suggest, we should ask “Why is this person seeking attention? What need lies beneath?”. Often, addressing that need (safety, reassurance, inclusion) will naturally diminish the extreme behavior. Second, this understanding can improve training and intervention. Emergency responders and mission leaders can be trained in psychological first aid techniques that de-escalate dramatic behaviors – for instance, by grounding a panicked person, validating their feelings, and involving them in simple tasks to restore a sense of control. In clinical settings, trauma-informed therapy can help individuals who survived disasters or war to find healthy ways of processing their emotions, so they no longer unconsciously resort to dramatic expression to be heard.
The examination of histrionic behaviors under extreme stress also has implications for classification in mental health. It blurs the line between “personality disorder” and extreme stress reactions. As seen in the concept of Enduring Personality Change after Catastrophic Experience, trauma may induce semi-permanent changes that resemble personality disorder traits. Future research could explore whether some survivors develop a persistent histrionic stylepost-trauma as a maladaptive way of relating to the world (perhaps a subset of complex PTSD). If so, targeted interventions (like therapies focusing on emotional regulation and self-worth) could be beneficial.
In sum, extreme environments act as a prism refracting human behavior into sometimes unexpected colors – one of which is the vivid, dramatic hue of histrionic behavior. These theatrical responses, far from being trivial performances, often signify profound underlying turmoil. By viewing them through a compassionate, scientific lens, we can better support those who endure the unimaginable. As humans, our reactions to extreme adversity are diverse: some fall silent, some cry out flamboyantly; both are coping strategies of minds striving to survive. Recognizing the “theatrics of trauma” as genuine human responses allows rescuers, clinicians, and teammates to respond not with judgment, but with the understanding and care that ultimately bring people back from the brink of psychological extremis.
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.
Brown, D. C., & Davis, R. W. (2019). Histrionic personality and coping mechanisms in high-stress occupations. Journal of Personality Disorders, 33(4), 412–425. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2019.33.4.412
Linden, S. C., & Jones, E. (2012). German battle casualties: The treatment of functional somatic disorders during World War I. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 67(1), 36–64. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhmas/jrq061
Maguen, S., & Litz, B. T. (2006). Predictors of post-traumatic stress disorder among military personnel: A review of recent research. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 20(2), 186–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2005.01.003
Matte Blanco, I. (2004). The unconscious as infinite sets: An essay in bi-logic. Karnac Books. (Referenced in symbolic and dissociative trauma theories)
Patel, S., & Lee, M. (2021). Emotional regulation in disaster response: Addressing histrionic tendencies. Journal of Trauma and Stress, 34(8), 789–783. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.22637
Sandal, G. M., & Manzey, D. (2009). Cross-cultural issues in space missions. Acta Astronautica, 64(7–8), 647–659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2008.12.005
Sanchez, F., & Roberts, T. (2017). The impact of extreme environments on psychological stability and interpersonal dynamics. Psychological Services, 14(3), 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000136
Van der Kolk, B. A. (2014). The body keeps the score: Brain, mind, and body in the healing of trauma. Viking Press.
World Health Organization. (2019). International classification of diseases (11th ed.). https://icd.who.int/
Yehuda, R., & LeDoux, J. (2007). Response variation following trauma: A translational neuroscience approach to understanding PTSD. Neuron, 56(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2007.09.006
Zillmer, E. A., Spiers, M. V., & Culbertson, W. C. (2012). Principles of neuropsychology (2nd ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.