Betrayal Trauma, Perpetrator Psychology, and Witness-Survivor Resilience: A Case Study of Father Norbert J. Maday in the Chicago Archdiocese | Melanie Boling, Boling Expeditionary Research

Betrayal Trauma, Perpetrator Psychology, and Witness-Survivor Resilience: A Case Study of Father Norbert J. Maday in the Chicago Archdiocese

Abstract

Clergy-perpetrated sexual abuse (CPSA) is uniquely harmful because it fuses interpersonal violation with the betrayal of sacred authority and institutional trust. This paper examines the case of Father Norbert J. Maday, a Chicago Archdiocese priest convicted of sexually abusing minors, as a lens to explore perpetrator psychology, betrayal trauma theory, and the neuropsychological and psychological sequelae of abuse. The analysis emphasizes the underexamined population of “witness-survivors”: children who resisted inappropriate advances, observed abusive behaviors, or voiced concerns, but were dismissed or punished by family and parish staff. Maday’s behavioral profile demonstrates grooming, cognitive distortions, narcissistic entitlement, antisocial tendencies, and moral disengagement, all reinforced by institutional silence. Survivors—including witnesses—show classic betrayal trauma responses, including HPA axis dysregulation, amygdala hyperactivation, hippocampal alterations, and prefrontal suppression. The paper further demonstrates the devastating psychological impact of gaslighting and Catholic guilt, which were weaponized to control and silence children. A narrative vignette illustrates these dynamics in the lived experience of an altar server who resisted Maday’s advances, described him as “a creep,” but was punished for her resistance. Her later retraumatization upon discovering archival confirmation of the Church’s prior knowledge underscores the power of institutional betrayal. The paper concludes by highlighting the extraordinary resilience required of survivors, the role of neuroplasticity and post-traumatic growth in healing, and clinical implications for trauma-informed and spiritually integrative care.

1. Introduction

The Catholic Church has faced unprecedented global scrutiny for systemic sexual abuse perpetrated by clergy. These crimes are distinguished not only by their frequency and scale but also by their context: the abuse occurs within institutions that claim spiritual authority, moral superiority, and a mandate to protect the vulnerable. Survivors of clergy-perpetrated sexual abuse (CPSA) endure harm that extends beyond the physical and psychological; the abuse also fractures their relationship to the sacred, destabilizing meaning, trust, and belonging.

The Archdiocese of Chicago, one of the largest in the United States, became a focal point of the crisis when records confirmed decades of concealment. Among the priests identified, Father Norbert J. Maday is emblematic. Ordained in 1964, convicted in Wisconsin in 1994, and laicized in 2007, Maday’s career reveals both the individual pathology of an offender and the systemic failures of the Church. The release of documents in 2019 confirmed that parish leaders, including those at St. Jude, were aware of misconduct and failed to act, exposing children to repeated danger.

This paper situates Maday’s crimes within the frameworks of betrayal trauma, moral injury, and institutional betrayal. Crucially, it expands focus beyond direct contact survivors to include “witness-survivors”—those who resisted, observed, or reported abuse but were dismissed or punished. Their trauma is no less significant, and their resilience reveals vital insights into recovery.

2. Perpetrator’s Psychological & Behavioral Profile

Maday’s behavioral profile aligns with research on clergy offenders.

  • Grooming Strategies. Offenders often cultivate trust by presenting themselves as spiritual mentors, authority figures, or benevolent caretakers. Maday’s role as priest provided ready-made access to children, and parish staff facilitated proximity by unquestioningly honoring clerical authority.

  • Cognitive Distortions. Offenders rationalize abuse through minimization (“I did not cause harm”), denial of responsibility (“the child initiated”), or moral justification (“this is part of closeness or mentorship”). These distortions shield the perpetrator from guilt and normalize repeated offending.

  • Personality Disorder Traits. Psychological profiles of clergy offenders highlight traits consistent with narcissistic and antisocial tendencies: entitlement, lack of empathy, manipulation, disregard for consequences, and exploitation of institutional protection.

  • Repetition Compulsion. Despite warnings and risks, Maday reoffended repeatedly. This persistence reflects both internal compulsion (reinforced by gratification and lack of empathy) and external reinforcement (absence of accountability).

  • Moral Disengagement. Maday’s clerical identity likely fueled a sense of untouchability. Research shows that offenders in positions of authority disengage morally by compartmentalizing their roles, using their status as justification.

  • Institutional Reinforcement. The Archdiocese’s concealment acted as an enabler, teaching him that his crimes would not only go unpunished but actively be hidden. Social learning theory posits that behavior persists when negative consequences are absent. Maday’s decades-long abuse illustrates this principle starkly.

3. Institutional Betrayal and Gaslighting

Institutional betrayal occurs when trusted organizations commit or enable harm. St. Jude parish provides a case study.

Children who resisted Maday’s behavior were punished, not supported. Catholic guilt was strategically invoked: defiance toward a priest was reframed as sin, disobedience, or ingratitude. This weaponization of religious doctrine controlled children through shame.

Gaslighting compounded trauma. Survivors who described Maday as inappropriate were told they were mistaken, exaggerating, or disobedient. Families deeply embedded in the parish reinforced this silencing. Gaslighting fractures self-trust, creating cognitive dissonance: “I saw this” versus “They say it did not happen.” This conflict taxes prefrontal regulation and fosters long-term confusion and anxiety.

4. Neurobiology of Betrayal Trauma

Betrayal trauma uniquely alters neurobiological functioning:

  • HPA Axis Dysregulation. Chronic activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis leads to hypervigilance, disrupted cortisol rhythms, immune suppression, and somatic symptoms.

  • Amygdala Hyperactivation. Heightened threat detection produces exaggerated startle responses, anxiety disorders, and intrusive fear conditioning.

  • Hippocampal Alterations. Memory consolidation is impaired; trauma memories fragment, surfacing as flashbacks.

  • Prefrontal Cortex Suppression. Stress reduces prefrontal regulation, limiting executive control and emotional regulation.

  • Witness Trauma. For children who observed abuse, empathic neural circuitry (insula, anterior cingulate) processes peer suffering. This creates secondary traumatic stress, which is biologically encoded similarly to direct abuse.

5. Narrative Vignette: The Witness-Survivor

A female altar server at St. Jude consistently resisted Maday’s inappropriate behaviors, describing him as “a creep.” Parish staff and her family, both deeply involved in the parish, punished her resistance. Catholic guilt was leveraged: her refusal was reframed as sinful, disrespectful, or disobedient.

She witnessed Maday behave inappropriately toward peers and voiced concern, but was dismissed and told she was wrong. The dissonance between what she perceived and what adults insisted she accept created lasting confusion and internalized shame.

Decades later, in 2019, released documents confirmed that parish leaders and clergy had long known of Maday’s abuse. For her, the revelation retraumatized but also validated her suppressed truth, highlighting both the enduring wound of institutional betrayal and the resilience of survivors who held onto reality in the face of denial.

6. Psychological Sequelae

The outcomes of such trauma are profound:

  • Complex PTSD. Survivors exhibit hypervigilance, intrusive memories, dissociation, and avoidance.

  • Moral Injury. The violation of moral expectation by a priest and parish community generates existential distress and disillusionment.

  • Attachment Disruption. Punishment by family and faith leaders undermines trust, producing insecure or disorganized attachment.

  • Internalized Shame. Gaslighting and guilt embed shame, eroding self-worth.

  • Secondary Retraumatization. Public revelation of the Archdiocese’s concealment decades later reignited trauma, reopening wounds of betrayal.

7. Resilience and Recovery

Despite profound harm, survivors demonstrate resilience:

  • Behavioral Resilience. The act of resisting, despite punishment, reflects an intact survival instinct.

  • Psychological Resilience. Maintaining internal truth against external denial requires cognitive strength and emotional tenacity.

  • Moral Resilience. Refusing to accept imposed guilt and reclaiming personal moral authority is central to recovery.

  • Neuroplasticity. Trauma therapies (EMDR, somatic therapies, mindfulness) can rewire fear pathways. Survivors may experience post-traumatic growth, transforming pain into advocacy, scholarship, or spirituality.

8. Clinical Implications

Clinicians must:

  • Recognize the trauma of witness-survivors—resisting, witnessing, and being punished are themselves traumatic.

  • Use trauma-informed modalities (EMDR, trauma-focused CBT, somatic work) while integrating frameworks for moral injury.

  • Address spiritual disorientation and support survivors in reclaiming spirituality, whether within or outside religious structures.

  • Understand perpetrator psychology to develop prevention strategies that disrupt grooming, entitlement, and institutional complicity.

9. Conclusion

The case of Father Norbert Maday demonstrates how perpetrator psychology, institutional betrayal, and survivor resilience converge to shape trauma. His crimes were enabled by cognitive distortions, narcissistic entitlement, and systemic cover-ups. Survivors—both direct victims and witnesses—endured neurobiological alterations, psychological sequelae, and spiritual harm. Yet many displayed extraordinary resilience, maintaining their truth in the face of denial and finding pathways to healing.

Betrayal trauma is not only a matter of personal violation but of systemic collusion. Neuroscience and psychology together explain both the depth of harm and the potential for recovery. Acknowledgment, survivor-centered care, and institutional accountability are essential for justice and healing.

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.

  • Bremner, J. D. (2006). Traumatic stress: Effects on the brain. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 8(4), 445–461.

  • Freyd, J. J. (1996). Betrayal trauma: The logic of forgetting childhood abuse. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Freyd, J. J., & Birrell, P. J. (2013). Blind to betrayal: Why we fool ourselves we aren’t being fooled. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

  • Herman, J. L. (1992/2015). Trauma and recovery: The aftermath of violence—from domestic abuse to political terror. New York, NY: Basic Books.

  • John Jay College of Criminal Justice. (2004). The nature and scope of sexual abuse of minors by Catholic priests and deacons in the United States, 1950–2002. Washington, DC: U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops.

  • McCrory, E., De Brito, S. A., & Viding, E. (2010). Research review: The neurobiology and genetics of maltreatment and adversity. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51(10), 1079–1095.

  • Pargament, K. I., Murray-Swank, N. A., & Mahoney, A. (2008). Problem and solution: The spiritual dimension of clergy sexual abuse and its impact on survivors. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 17(3–4), 397–420.

  • Rogers, C. E., & Silverman, M. A. (2020). Childhood trauma and amygdala function. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 14, 98.

  • Smith, C. P., & Freyd, J. J. (2014). Institutional betrayal. American Psychologist, 69(6), 575–587.

  • Teicher, M. H., & Samson, J. A. (2016). Annual research review: Enduring neurobiological effects of childhood abuse and neglect. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57(3), 241–266.

  • van der Kolk, B. A. (2014). The body keeps the score: Brain, mind, and body in the healing of trauma. New York, NY: Viking.

  • Wilson, J. P., & Drozdek, B. (Eds.). (2004). Broken spirits: The treatment of traumatized asylum seekers, refugees, war and torture victims. New York, NY: Brunner-Routledge.

  • Zurbriggen, E. L., & Freyd, J. J. (2004). The link between child sexual abuse and risky sexual behavior: The role of dissociation and betrayal. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 5(3), 125–142.

  • Illinois Office of the Attorney General. (2023). Report on Catholic clergy child sex abuse in Illinois. Springfield, IL: Illinois Attorney General’s Office