Effects of Hybristophilia (“Bonnie and Clyde” Syndrome) on Brain and Behavior
Abstract: Hybristophilia is a rare paraphilia characterized by sexual attraction to individuals who commit crimes or violence. This phenomenon – often sensationalized as “Bonnie and Clyde syndrome” – involves complex neurobiological and psychological dynamics. We review evidence on brain mechanisms (e.g., reward circuitry, fear/arousal processing) and neurochemistry (adrenaline, oxytocin, dopamine) that may underlie sexual attraction to dangerous partners. Behavioral factors such as personality (e.g. “dark triad” traits, impulsivity), attachment styles (fearful or anxious bonds), and trauma history are discussed as correlates of hybristophilia. Clinical case studies illustrate how hybristophilic individuals (often women) may become accomplices to violent lovers. This attraction often coexists with other psychopathology (cluster B personality features, masochistic or sadomasochistic tendencies). Finally, we consider societal and evolutionary perspectives: some evolutionary theories suggest women may be drawn to high-status or dominant males (especially under certain hormonal conditions) , while modern media (true-crime fandom, social networks) can glamorize criminals and shape hybristophilic identities . Understanding hybristophilia requires an integrated neurobiological and psychosocial framework, as outlined below.
Introduction
Hybristophilia is defined as an atypical sexual interest in people who commit violent or illegal acts (sometimes called Bonnie and Clyde syndrome) . First described by Money (1986) as a “lovemap” distortion, hybristophilia involves arousal from one’s partner’s violent crimes or cruelty. Clinical reports note two forms: passive (romanticized attraction, letter-writing, idolizing criminals) and aggressive (actively assisting or committing crimes with a beloved offender). Though traditionally observed in female admirers of male criminals, recent cases highlight that men can also develop this paraphilia when infatuated with violent female offenders. Prevalence is unknown due to underreporting, but media accounts (e.g. fans writing to notorious serial killers) reflect its existence. This review synthesizes current knowledge on the neural and behavioral correlates of hybristophilia. We cover (1) neurobiological mechanisms (brain circuits, hormones, and neurotransmitters of attraction and fear), (2) psychological/behavioral patterns (personality, attachment), (3) illustrative clinical cases, (4) links with psychopathology (e.g. cluster B disorders, trauma), and (5) evolutionary/social context (mate-selection biases, cultural influences). The goal is a comprehensive, up-to-date analysis based on forensic psychology, neuroscience, and psychiatry literature.
Neurobiological Mechanisms
Neuroimaging of sexual attraction more broadly implicates the mesolimbic reward system (ventral striatum/nucleus accumbens, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, thalamus, etc.) in processing preferred sexual stimuli. For example, one fMRI study reported stronger ventral striatal and thalamic responses when subjects viewed sexually preferred images. By analogy, hybristophiles may have their reward circuits activated by cues associated with criminal partners. The schematic in Figure 1 (based on Haber 2011) highlights key reward pathways: sensory inputs from cortex and amygdala converge on the ventral striatum, which via dopaminergic midbrain projections (e.g. ventral tegmental area) drives motivated behaviors. Thus, a critical hypothesis is that dopamine-mediated reward signals might reinforce attraction to violent stimuli if the brain mislabels fear and excitement as erotic pleasure.
Heightened physiological arousal (e.g. from fear) may be misattributed as sexual excitation. In the classic suspension-bridge study, Dutton and Aron (1974) found men contacted by a female interviewer on an anxiety-inducing high bridge later reported more attraction to her than men on a low bridge. Similarly, cardiac and adrenaline surges from threatening experiences can amplify romantic or sexual feelings by confusion of emotion (the “excitation transfer” effect ). In hybristophilia, witnessing or imagining violent crime might trigger such misattribution. Neurochemically, adrenaline (norepinephrine) surges during fear or excitement, dopamine signals reward expectation, and oxytocin facilitates bonding – all could contribute. Interestingly, oxytocin – often dubbed the “love hormone” – has a dual role. Recent work shows oxytocin strengthens fearful or aversive memories and can even increase anxiety when social stress is salient . In a mouse model, activation of oxytocin receptors in the lateral septum significantly enhanced fear learning and anxiety. This suggests that the same neurohormone that promotes trust may also intensify fear-related arousal. In hybristophilia, co-activation of oxytocin (bonding) and adrenaline (fear) systems might produce a unique mix of terror and pleasure in romantic attachment. Functional connectivity studies of fear and reward circuits (e.g. amygdala–striatal pathways) could test whether hybristophilic individuals show unusual coupling: for instance, heightened amygdala and striatum responses to criminal images. While no direct neuroimaging of hybristophiles exists, these circuit-level models link general sexual arousal networks with fear/anxiety pathways (amygdala, hypothalamus) to explain attraction to risk.
Behavioral and Psychological Features
Individuals with hybristophilia often share distinctive personality and attachment traits. In experimental studies of romantic preferences, female participants generally reject antisocial traits in ideal mates, but a subset showed greater tolerance for “dark” characteristics. For example, Watts et al. found that, on average, women preferred partners lacking typical psychopathic traits; however, women high in personality pathology (cluster B features) were relatively more inclined to choose men with psychopathic or criminal tendencies . Specifically, interpersonal-affective (Factor 1) psychopathy traits (callousness, lack of empathy) were marginally preferred by some women in short-term contexts . This suggests hybristophiles may have dark triad profiles themselves (e.g. narcissistic, borderline, antisocial personality traits) that make antisocial partners seem normal or exciting.
Attachment style is also key. People with anxious or avoidant attachment may gravitate toward dangerous partners. In one study of women’s attraction to “villains vs. heroes” in media, higher avoidant attachment predicted villain attraction (mediated by the women’s own maladaptive traits), whereas anxious attachment predicted attraction to heroic figures . In short, insecurely attached individuals – especially those who fear intimacy or expect others to be untrustworthy – may ironically become enamored with dangerous suitors, potentially because they equate danger with intensity. Supporting this, reviewers have noted that battered or traumatized women often report low self-esteem, emotional dependence, and borderline traits, which predispose them to enter or remain in violent relationships . Hybristophilia may overlap with such dynamics: some individuals may seek the drama of a criminal relationship due to a history of abuse or abandonment, finding the partner’s power intoxicating despite the risks.
Qualitative accounts highlight common narratives: rescuing or reforming the offender, and craving excitement. Clinicians report hybristophiles often hold “savior” fantasies – believing their love can change or redeem the criminal – even while enjoying stories of the crimes. For instance, forensic psychologist Katherine Ramsland notes some female fans insist “he had a bad childhood, you wouldn’t see what he did” . At the same time, the partner’s notoriety or “bad boy” image can be eroticized. Pettigrew’s case report of men aiding a female serial killer noted the main accomplice “luxuriated in [her] notoriety” and was “caught up in the excitement and fascination” of the murders . Thus, hybristophilic attraction seems driven by a potent mix of thrill-seeking and emotional grandiosity: the criminal’s danger provides adrenaline rush, while the romance of a forbidden love fulfills psychological needs.
Clinical Case Studies
A handful of clinical reports illustrate hybristophilia in action. Traditionally these involve women writing love letters to incarcerated killers (e.g. Ted Bundy, BTK) or even marrying convicted murderers. Psychiatrists have categorized such women as passive hybristophiles: they idolize criminals from afar, sometimes even blaming victims or rationalizing the crimes. Less common but more dramatic are aggressive hybristophiles, who partner directly with dangerous offenders. Pettigrew (2019) described the “Peterborough Ditch Murders” case: Joanne Dennehy, a British serial killer, collected several male admirers after her arrest. Three men confessed to helping dispose of bodies and mislead police, despite having no prior criminal background. The court records reveal these men were deeply infatuated. One accomplice “reveled in helping her… luxuriated in the notoriety of Dennehy,” with the judge observing he was “caught up in the excitement and fascination” of her crimes . Another was found with a gruesome photo of a victim on his phone as a “morbid souvenir,” undermining any claim of duress . All had contributed to her criminal acts (e.g. providing knives, helping lure victims) simply to please her. This case is unprecedented as an inverted serial-killing trio where the woman was leader and men were submissive accomplices, all motivated by hybristophilic attachment .
Other cases include women joining militant or gang activities because of romantic involvements (e.g. female devotees of crime bosses), and “black widow” scenarios where women marry and assist violent killers. Across documented cases, common clinical notes are low empathy, intense obsession, and willingness to share violence. One forensic review found female killers like Dennehy often have sadomasochistic paraphilias themselves . Indeed, Dennehy was diagnosed with paraphilia sexual masochism. In these relationships, the hybristophilic partner may experience sexual arousal from the shared violence – blurring lines between loving and sadistic acts.
Overall, case literature shows that hybristophiles may actively participate in violent crimes, beyond mere fantasy. Their behavior tends toward extreme devotion: driving perpetrators to victims, disposing bodies, or facilitating crimes – well beyond what would be expected from duress . These examples underscore how profoundly hybristophilic attraction can alter behavior: seemingly ordinary individuals become criminal accomplices out of romantic fixation.
Psychopathological Correlates
Hybristophilia itself is not a formal psychiatric diagnosis, but it is often seen in the context of other mental disorders and trauma. Many hybristophiles exhibit Cluster B personality features. Borderline personality traits (impulsivity, unstable relationships, idealization of partners) are frequently noted among women abused by criminals. Narcissistic or histrionic traits (attention-seeking through dramatic relationships) also appear relevant. For example, individuals with elevated personality pathology were more likely to prefer psychopathic-like partners in Watts et al.’s study . Similarly, the accomplices of Dennehy showed traits of dependency and exhibitionism (e.g. collecting trophies, bragging about crimes) consistent with abnormal personality. Hybristophilia may be conceptualized as a paraphilic form of sexual masochism or sadomasochism: the risk of violence becomes itself erotic. Dennehy’s classification as a sexual sadist suggests overlapping paraphilic dynamics. In fact, Money (1986) and later authors classify hybristophilia under “Disorders of sexual preference” .
History of trauma or attachment trauma is another common thread. Some hybristophiles report childhood abuse or neglect, which can produce a traumatic attachment style. Disorganized or anxious attachments can later manifest as attraction to abusive partners (a “victim-perpetrator bond”). One review noted that women who experienced intimate partner violence often have learned helplessness and low self-worth, factors that enable victimization. In hybristophilia, the admirer may have empathic identification with the criminal (e.g., “he was hurt too, like me”), or a drive to right perceived wrongs in the offender. The interplay of unresolved trauma and psychosexual dysregulation likely underpins many cases.
Finally, hypertrophilia often co-occurs with paraphilic interests. For instance, erotophilia toward gore or violence (even in fantasy) might predispose someone to actual dangerous liaisons. Forensic profiles sometimes find comorbid fetishes: death-related sexual fantasies, bondage, or graphic pornography preferences. These psychosexual pathologies feed into the neurobiological arousal circuits discussed above. In summary, hybristophilia tends to arise in individuals with pronounced psychopathology – especially Cluster B traits and trauma histories – which could be primary or secondary to their criminal fixation.
Societal and Evolutionary Perspectives
From an evolutionary standpoint, some theorists propose that attraction to “bad boys” may have roots in mate selection for genetic quality or status. During peak fertility, women’s mate preferences shift toward traits signaling dominance and physical prowess. Giebel and Weierstall (2013) found that women in their fertile phase rated aggressive but healthy-looking men as particularly attractive. One interpretation is that masculine, risk-taking qualities could historically indicate good genes or protection. Thus, for a small group of women, criminal partners (perceived as strong and daring) might unconsciously fit this adaptive pattern. Conversely, the same study showed that men with signs of psychological trauma (e.g. high cortisol, PTSD symptoms) were rated as less attractive. This implies that true illness or stress can override any supposed “good genes” advantage. Reality diverges from fantasy: many criminals carry damage and danger that repels rather than attracts.
Culturally, modern media likely amplify hybristophilia. True-crime content has exploded in popularity, and social media forums (Twitter, TikTok, Reddit) facilitate public fascination. Observational studies of online “true crime fandom” note a minority of fans who romanticize perpetrators. For instance, Barone (2025) reports that in online communities, some users “romanticize the criminals…discuss[ing] the desire to date…murderers,” even editing killer photos with hearts. A 2024 study found TikTok hashtags and videos overtly dedicated to hybristophilia, where young women share fantasies about notorious killers (Thomas et al., 2025). Such peer environments can normalize hybristophilic attitudes and create echo chambers that reinforce attraction. In addition, the “celebrity criminal” phenomenon (movies, books, news) glamorizes certain offenders, sometimes overshadowing victims’ suffering. This cultural backdrop provides a context in which hybristophilia can flourish as a misguided romance narrative.
In short, hybristophilia may be partially understood as an extreme extension of universal patterns (thrill-seeking, hero-worship) that in a few individuals become pathologically focused on violence. Evolutionarily, the tension between seeking strong mates and avoiding danger plays out in these rare cases. Socially, the internet-age fascination with crime has lowered barriers between the real and the romantic, creating new subcultures of criminal idolization. It remains difficult to disentangle innate predispositions from learned cultural influences, but both likely contribute to the phenomenon.
Discussion
Hybristophilia sits at the intersection of sexual arousal, emotional attachment, and criminal psychology. Neurobiologically, it implicates core reward circuits (ventral striatum, dopamine systems) together with fear and stress pathways (amygdala, adrenaline, oxytocin) in a unique way. Although direct empirical studies on hybristophiles are lacking, existing neuroscience suggests their brains might react to criminal stimuli as if to a preferred sexual image . Behaviorally, hybristophiles often exhibit traits (impulsivity, thrill-seeking, dependency) that align with both paraphilias and trauma-related disorders. The co-occurrence of borderline or antisocial personality features, as seen in case reports, may both drive and result from these relationships.
Documented cases demonstrate that hybristophilia can have grave consequences: lovers who commit violence, victims overlooked, and a twisting of love into complicity. Clinicians and law enforcement should be aware of this syndrome as a risk factor for extreme partner behaviors. Forensic assessment of offenders sometimes notes devoted followers (e.g. serial killer fan letters) as part of the social landscape of crime. Yet, more systematic research is needed. Future work could include clinical interviews with self-identified hybristophiles, psychophysiological studies of arousal to criminal vs. non-criminal sexual images, or genetic/neurohormonal profiling to identify biological susceptibilities. Understanding attachment histories in these individuals is also crucial; interventions addressing past trauma might mitigate pathological attractions.
In conclusion, hybristophilia is a multi-determined phenomenon best viewed through both a neurobiological and psychosocial lens. Brain reward and arousal systems, combined with personality and attachment vulnerabilities, create a context in which criminal acts become sexually charged. Societal factors – from evolutionary mating strategies to modern media – modulate how this manifests. By synthesizing neuroscience, psychology, and forensic data, this review provides a framework to understand the “Bonnie and Clyde” syndrome more fully, and to distinguish pathological attraction from normal romantic arousal.
References
Dutton, D. G., & Aron, A. P. (1974). Some evidence for heightened sexual attraction under conditions of high anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(4), 510–517. doi:10.1037/h0037031
Frowijn, I., Vos, L. M. W., Masthoff, E., & Bogaerts, S. (2022). We don’t choose whom we love: Predictors for romantic attraction to villains. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, 802988. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.802988
Giebel, G., & Weierstall, R. (2013). Female attraction to appetitive-aggressive men is modulated by women’s menstrual cycle and men’s vulnerability to traumatic stress. Evolutionary Psychology, 11(1), 248–262. doi:10.1177/147470491301100122
Money, J. (1986). Lovemaps: Clinical concepts of sexual/erotic health and pathology. International Universities Press.
Pettigrew, M. (2019). Aggressive hybristophilia in men and the effect of a female serial killer. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 30(3), 421–427. doi:10.1080/14789949.2018.1507898
Ponseti, J., Bosinski, H. A., Wolff, S., Peller, M., Jansen, O., Mehdorn, H. M., & Krüger, T. (2006). A functional endophenotype for sexual orientation in humans. NeuroImage, 33(3), 825–833. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.08.002
Radulovic, J., et al. (2013). Fear-enhancing effects of septal oxytocin receptors. Nature Neuroscience, 16(9), 1185–1187. doi:10.1038/nn.3465
Thomas, J. V., Williams, H. E. V., Slater, H. E., & Gomez, C. T. (2025). Unpacking the construction of online identities of hybristophilia communities on TikTok. Deviant Behavior, 46(2), 179–194. doi:10.1080/01639625.2024.2338273
Vicary, A. M., & Fraley, R. C. (2010). Captured by true crime: Why are women drawn to tales of rape, murder, and serial killers? Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1(1), 81–86. doi:10.1177/1948550609355486
Watts, A. L., Rohr, J. C., McCauley, K. L., Smith, S. F., Howe, K. L., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2019). Do psychopathic birds of a feather flock together? Psychopathic personality traits and romantic preferences. Journal of Personality, 87(2), 341–362. doi:10.1111/jopy.12394
